CoDeS LLC › Research › Technical evidence summary

Technical evidence summary

Internal R&D observations · summarized from the November 2026 capability statement

This page summarizes the internal R&D results CoDeS LLC has reviewed and reported to date. They are our own development observations, not independent validation.

Internal R&D results, what each shows, and its limits
TestResultWhat it showsWhat it does not show
Governed-job graph test
October 17, 2026 · bounded
13 nodes and 18 typed relationships: 7 hash-matched, 11 owner-recorded, 0 mismatches in that sample.A request, identities, a policy decision, an execution and an independent observation can be linked into one reviewable graph.Behaviour at scale, or with hostile input. One sample, one environment.
Code-location benchmark
October 19, 2026
60 of 60 correct files and lines. 27 of 27 invented or out-of-scope symbols correctly reported as not found. No AI model was used.A deterministic lookup can answer “not found” instead of guessing.General coding or reasoning quality. It covers source-location questions only.
Governed development jobs
2026 · ongoing
Jobs have produced execution, Proof and UNIFY records.The record chain from request to observed result can be produced end to end in our prototype.Independent product certification. These are internal records.

How to read these results

  • Independent observation means the system reads back the actual result after an action and compares it with what was approved, instead of trusting an AI-written “done” message.
  • Hash-matched means a recorded relationship was checked against the recorded bytes. Owner-recorded means the component that owns the data recorded the relationship, but it was not cross-checked by a hash.
  • Missing or stale data stays visible as incomplete. It is not counted as success.

Test environment

A two-device prototype on operator-controlled hardware: an Android phone used as the control point and a Windows computer used for heavier work.

What we do not claim

  • No NIST endorsement or certification.
  • No independently certified product.
  • No federal contract past performance.
  • Production deployment, licensing and independent validation would require further qualification and agreement.
Redacted technical receipts are available for qualified technical review. Request them by email.

Capability statement · Whitepaper · Public comment to NIST